
Policy
Religious Freedom
Respecting human dignity requires that we respect the core elements of how people and groups identify themselves, including their religious beliefs. Religious belief has been a powerful motivation for protecting the rights and liberties of others; it kindled movements to abolish slavery and protect Americans’ civil rights. For millions of Americans, religion is the source of the values required in a free society, such as understanding, respect and sacrifice for others. Additionally, religious institutions provide irreplaceable care for the most vulnerable people in society.
For all of these reasons, the right to exercise religion is a fundamental human right. The law should respect the independence of religious institutions, defend the right of conscience, and protect the right of individuals to act on their religious beliefs, while establishing reasonable protections for public health and safety in a spirit of fairness for all.
Conversations
-
It's a bad idea for government to violate religious liberty
-
Religious liberty is good for everyone – not just religious people
-
Religion doesn't need a permission slip from the government
-
Religious freedom and conscience in higher education
-
Religious freedom, courts, and federalism in Utah | Bill Duncan
-
The benefit of religious contributions to society
-
How facts help provide a more positive perception of religion
-
How to persuade religious skeptics without preaching
-
Advice to the younger generation on the benefits of religion
Insights & Takeaways
-

Religiosity improves psychological resilience, study says
Read More: Religiosity improves psychological resilience, study saysA recent report from a diverse group of scholars says that “religious norms” in poorer countries lessen the psychological burden of poverty – pointing to religiosity as a significant source…
-

Protection of religious freedom results in a range of secular benefits
Read More: Protection of religious freedom results in a range of secular benefits“Rather than banishing religious organizations from the public square or overlooking their potential influence, elected officials should create space for faith-based groups to thrive and contribute.”
-

Texas abortion case: a civics lesson on the federal court system
Read More: Texas abortion case: a civics lesson on the federal court systemAs the U.S. has grown through its history and adapted to new circumstances, so, too, has the judicial branch. Its history suggests that it will continue to do so into…
-

Supreme Court decisions establish precedent for future cases
Read More: Supreme Court decisions establish precedent for future casesEven though the Supreme Court does not resolve a large proportion of the cases that are presented to it, the decisions it does issue reverberate to affect many other disputes…
-

Why the judiciary is so distinct: It was designed to react, not initiate action
Read More: Why the judiciary is so distinct: It was designed to react, not initiate actionThe judiciary branch is designed as a responsive, not proactive, branch of government. The court can’t tell Congress not to pass an unconstitutional law or tell the president not to…
-

Latest Supreme Court religious freedom case: Boston flagpole dispute
Read More: Latest Supreme Court religious freedom case: Boston flagpole disputeLast week, the court announced it would hear another case involving a claim of unequal treatment.












