Legal
-
Mahmoud v. Taylor
The laws of nearly every State (including Maryland) require schools to accommodate parents’ right to determine how their children are taught about sensitive topics.
-
Utah v. USA
The Constitution’s reservation of most powers to the States rather than the national government promotes accountability and responsiveness by ensuring that the decisions most likely to impact the day-to-day experiences of citizens will be made by elected representatives closest to them and with whom they can…
-
Masterpiece v. Scardina
The facts of this case carry a familiar echo from the U.S. Supreme Court’s past precedents rejecting government compelled affirmation in its many forms.
-
Utah v. Planned Parenthood
The United States Supreme Court has convincingly identified the fatal flaws in plaintiff’s religious freedom claims.
-
Cedar Park Assembly v. Kreidler
Centuries-old faith traditions and tens of millions of their adherents consider terminating the life of an unborn child to be a grave evil. Until recently, supporters and opponents of abortion rights acknowledged that coercing religious organizations to support abortion triggers profound questions of religious…
-
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands on Originals, Inc.
The appeals court correctly recognized that a nondiscrimination ordinance cannot be applied in a way that overrides constitutional and other statutory protections.
-
Neely v. Wyoming
It is contrary to the overwhelming and consistent practice in the United States of accommodating, wherever possible, the expression of religious views and the exercise of religious commitments.
-
Susette Kelo v. City of New London
While the public purposes that might be served by eminent domain are the same as those that might be served through the general police power, the eminent domain power is limited by the public use requirement of the 5th Amendment.